Lesson 2

Myths, folk beliefs, and propaganda: Misinformation noon at ngayon

Big Question:
How is the spread of misinformation in the Philippines related to our inclinations to myths, folk beliefs, and propaganda?

Fabricating information is not new. So are myths, hoaxes, superstitions and folk beliefs. Understanding complex phenomena like misinformation and propaganda today demands that we take a look into our history: how a piece of misinformation is built on ideas and narratives that are cultivated across time; how societies adapt to changes in media technologies and impact the ways we work with information; and, how many lessons from the past remain valuable today. In this lesson, we will go back in time and study misinformation with a historical lens.

Lesson Overview

By the end of this lesson, the student will be able to…

Keywords:
Misinformation, Propaganda, Myths, Folk beliefs

Duration:
90 minutes

Materials:

  1. Slide deck
  2. Explainer video
  3. Handouts
    1. Performance task: Timeline of Untruths
  4. Worksheets
    1. Exercise: Past versus Present

Preparation:
Prior to the session, instruct the students to watch Ambeth Ocampo’s recorded lecture on pandemics in Philippine history,
“History Comes Alive! w/ Prof. Ambeth Ocampo: PANDEMIC” (Ayala Museum, 2021). For the analysis activity, you may assign the students to research about the case studies and prepare for brainstorming prior to the session.

lesson 2

Lesson Proper

Motivation (10 minutes)

Begin the lesson by asking students about Filipino folktales, myths and legends they remember from when they were young. Ask why people tell and believe these stories even if they are not necessarily supported by facts. You may use the other guide questions below:

  • Should all stories be based on facts?
  • When is it okay or not okay for a story to not be based on facts? Can you cite a scenario where myths and folk beliefs can have negative or harmful effects on people?
Discussion (20 minutes)

Ask students about their takeaways from the pre-lesson viewing material, Ambeth Ocampo’s recorded lecture on pandemics in Philippine history. What does Ocampo say about the COVID-19 pandemic (which was the present context when the lecture was made) and other pandemics in Philippine history like Cholera in the 19th century?

Cholera and COVID-19: Misinformation superspreaders

Cholera, a communicable disease that can be acquired when a person consumes food from contaminated sources, was a global concern throughout the 19th until the early 20th century. Similar to COVID-19, the pandemic of the present 21st century, cholera claimed the lives of thousands of Filipinos. Also similarly, these health outbreaks were influenced by misinformation. Both then and now, religious and folk beliefs, rumors, and propaganda play a huge role in people's decision-making regarding their health conditions (Acevedo, 2021)

Let’s take a look at some snippets from our history:

  • In 1820, the Catholic clergy and Spanish merchants started rumors that deaths due to cholera had to do with non-Spanish foreigners poisoning wells. Believing this to be true, the angry natives took their bolos and massacred the foreigners. 
  • Heavily influenced by religious and superstitious beliefs, Filipinos feared the cholera outbreak as some divine punishment and a sign of the end of times. They wore wooden crosses around their necks or painted the cross in front of their houses and doors as protection. In Capiz, the people attributed the cholera to three evil spirits which poison the people. 
  • During the American period, an entire district in Manila was burned down and residents were turned to concentration camps where they were forcibly treated with medication. Harsh government measures like this were met with either fear or rage from the locals. It led to the spread of anti-American propaganda including rumors that Americans were dropping poison into wells to deliberately kill villagers. 

Misinformation as we know it today has always been present in society throughout human history – spread through rumors, folk beliefs, myths, propaganda, and other forms of communication. People are especially vulnerable during times of distress and confusion, such as pandemics. 

To draw similarities between past and present, identify popular rumors, folk beliefs, and propaganda that spread during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ask students to share how these affected their family’s decision-making on COVID-19 prevention and treatment.

Lecture (20 minutes)

Ask students what comes to mind when they hear the word “propaganda”. List them on the board and point out how most of them are negative descriptions. 

Propaganda: A tale as old as time

Spreading ideas or information to influence the public and promote a certain cause or person is nothing new. This definition of “propaganda” fits with what we learned from our high school history lesson on the 19th century Propaganda Movement. Led by our national heroes Jose Rizal, Graciano Lopez Jaena, and Marcelo H. Del Pilar, among others, the group published provocative propaganda pieces through the newsletter, La Solidaridad, lobbying for social, political and cultural reforms in the Philippines and inspiring Filipino nationalism. Propaganda, appreciated in this context, certainly means well, isn’t it?

Originally, the word “propaganda” was free of pejorative (negative) connotations and simply meant to spread or promote particular ideas, beliefs or values. But in the last centuries, propaganda has evolved along with developments in the mass media – press, radio, television, and film – that allowed for the production and dissemination of messages at a much larger scale. Radio, then a powerful, new medium during the 1930s, was used as an important propaganda tool by the Nazis to influence the German population.

Today, most people have come to associate modern propaganda with lies, deceit, manipulation, and smear campaigns meant to discredit or damage someone’s reputation or to forward selfish political agenda. 

In the 21st century, the internet and social media dramatically amplified the reach of propaganda. Untrustworthy content now goes viral through peer-to-peer distribution (i.e., many-to-many communication as opposed to one-to-many communication that characterizes mass media technologies). Moreover, there are technologies now that can create the impression of wide grassroots support for a certain issue (i.e., bots, sock puppet networks and astroturfing) and technologies that can seamlessly manipulate audio and video to create synthetic depictions of truth (i.e., deepfakes). 

Analysis (30 minutes)

Understanding complex phenomena like misinformation and propaganda demands that we study them with a historical lens. In this analysis activity, students will compare a case study of contemporary propaganda or misinformation with a case study from the pre-digital era. You may assign the students to conduct their research prior to the session so you can allot the time for brainstorming and presentation. Use the worksheet provided.

Case study 1: Trolling Maggie Wilson (contemporary)

In September 2023, model and entrepreneur Maggie Wilson called out in her Instagram page social media influencers who were allegedly paid to troll her and her company, Acasa Manila. In a series of Instagram stories, she exposed a group of online content creators hired to create negative videos about her on TikTok and other platforms. 

References: 

Case study 2: Code of Kalantiaw (pre-digital)

A pre-Hispanic Philippine penal code that was revered as an essential legal document of Filipinos, it was widely published in textbooks and was written about for decades. It was later debunked by historians and declared to be a hoax by the National Historical Institute. Still, some communities refuse to acknowledge its lack of historical basis.

References:

Analysis questions:

  1. Who or what has the most to gain from the propaganda or disinformation?
  2. Who is targeted by this? What are their existing opinions, beliefs and predispositions?
  3. What is the perception of the audience towards the source? 
  4. What are the means or techniques used (i.e., digital technologies used in the contemporary case)?
  5. How does the choice of media technologies and techniques affect the outcome? 
  6. How successful is the propaganda in achieving its purpose?
  7. If there is opposition to the propaganda, what form does it take?
Synthesis (10 minutes)

Quote Jose Rizal’s famous aphorism, “Ang hindi marunong lumingon sa pinanggalingan, hindi makakarating sa paroroonan (He who does not know how to look back on the origin, will not reach his destination).” Ask students what lessons from history should we find useful in facing today’s challenges of misinformation and harmful propaganda. 

Remember: Always contextualize

Be conscious of the experiences, feelings, beliefs and values that are important to people in a given period and the events and other circumstances that lead up to a point in time.Play the Lesson 2 video explainer to recap the main takeaways of the lesson. For possible next topics to discuss in class, check out the complete list of Disinfo Hub lessons here.

Performance Task and Other Activities

Performance Task

Timeline of Untruths

Instructions: Produce an infographic timeline that presents the historical context of a contemporary case of mis-/disinformation or propaganda that originated or involves the Philippines. The timeline should feature key events that happened in relation to the chosen case study. Besides basic information such as dates, places, and names of individuals or organizations involved, the entries in the timeline have to illustrate how the chosen case study is only a part of a much broader context in history. Use the guide questions from Jowett and O’Donnell (2019) to deconstruct the case study and weave together the parts of the timeline.

Jowett and O’Donnell (2019) notes that successful propaganda relates to the prevailing mood of the times; it is informed by the experiences, feelings, and thoughts of the target audiences of the propaganda:

  • What events have happened that lead up to this point in time? 
  • What is the current mood of the public? 
  • What deeply held beliefs and values have been important to people for a long time? 
  • What issues are being touched upon by the piece of propaganda or misinformation? How widely are these issues felt? 
  • Is there a struggle over power? 
  • What parties are involved, and what is at stake?

Depending on availability of resources and/or students’ skills, the timeline may be created by hand using markers, drawings, and/or cutouts in a cartolina/Manila paper or using digital tools like Canva, MS Powerpoint, or Adobe Photoshop.

The infographic timeline may be exhibited in a public area or, if done digitally, may be shared on social media or other digital platforms. Students may also present their work orally in class or in front of an audience.

Download the Performance Task rubrics here.

Activity

In addition to the guide questions provided in the analysis exercise in this lesson, add this one critical question that examines the motivations of the producer of propaganda: “Does it punch up or punch down?” Given that the nature of propaganda can be ambiguous – meaning, it is not inherently bad nor unethical, it can be regarded as beneficial or harmful – students should be taught how to deeply examine the purpose of a given piece of propaganda.

Punching up or punching down?

In evaluating pieces of propaganda, Prof. Jonathan Ong’s advice is to interrogate whether it “punches up or down.” To “punch up” means to attack or criticize someone who is in a position of power or authority. A good example of this is how satire and parody was used by the 19th century Propaganda Movement to expose the abuses and injustices done by Spanish colonizers to Filipinos. On the other hand, if people in authority like elected public officials sponsor the production of satirical videos mocking their political opponents, this can be argued as a case of “punching down” or spreading propaganda with foul or questionable intent. 

References

Main readings:

Additional references:

DepEd Learning Competencies

Use this lesson in the Grade 11/12 subject Media and Information Literacy (MIL), and align it with the following learning competencies:

  • Enumerates opportunities and challenges in media and information. MIL12LESI-IIIg-23
  • Realizes opportunities and challenges in media and information. MIL11/12OCP-IIIh-24
  • Researches and cites recent examples of the power of media and information to affect change. MIL11/12OCP-IIIh-25
  • Evaluates current trends in media and information and how it will affect/how they affect individuals and the society as a whole. MIL11/12CFT-IIIi-26
  • Cites studies showing proof of positive and negative effects of media, information on individuals and society. MIL11/12PM-IVa-1

Use this lesson in the Grade 11/12 subject Understanding Culture Society, and Politics (UCSP), and align it with the following learning competencies:

  • Promote protection of human dignity, rights, and the common good. CSP11/12BMSIh-19
  • Analyze social and political structures. UCSP11/12HSOIIj-23
  • Conduct participant observation (e.g., attend, describe, and reflect on a religious ritual of a different group; observe elections practices) UCSP11/12HSOIIg-28
  • Identify new challenges faced by human populations in contemporary societies. UCSP11/12CSCIIh-33
  • Describe how human societies adapt to new challenges in the physical, social, and cultural environment. UCSP11/12CSCIIi-34
  • Develop a plan of action for community-based response to change. USP11/12CSCIIj-35
Learning Beyond the Classroom

For school-based student governments, youth-based organizations, or youth councils (Sangguniang Kabataan):

Conducting a survey on the perceptions and skills of your constituency with regards to disinformation can serve as a good basis for crafting contextualized programs to tackle disinformation in your community. This lesson provides a general overview of disinformation in the country, and can be a perfect springboard to launch a multi-session training program or a community-based project that can mobilize your constituents for other civic ends.

CC_BY-NC-SA.svg

© This resource is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This means you are free to copy and redistribute the material, remix, transform or build upon it so long as you attribute Sigla Research Center and Out of The Box Media Literacy Initiative as the original source. View detailed license information at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

PH Disinfo Hub is a collaboration between Sigla Research Center and Out of The Box Media Literacy.

Welcome to the PH Disinfo Hub!

Please let us know your reason(s) for visiting the Hub. Rest assured that your response will not be shared with any outside parties. Thank you!